What if World War 2 was capitalism vs. communism?

Capitalism vs communism

Rather a one sided war - you cannot show me any u201ccapitalistsu201d in that war, so there was no capitalism to fight, or be fought.

,The main battle, in Russia, was between revolutionary international socialism-the USSR (though I think Stalin had to back down to the idea of u201cSocialism in one countryu201d - and fight a u201cGreat Patriotic Waru201d) - versus the Nazis - who were a Nationalist Workers Party - so about as Socialist as you can get: the whole just left versus more left.

All part of the Great Century of Leftist Murderousness, far exceeding what Aristocrats and Kings have ever managed.

,But donu2019t tell this to anyone on the left: they get all hurt with facts.

Capitalism vs socialism vs communism PDF

The death toll from capitalism is so high that it isnu2019t even worth comparing it to communism.

However, if you are interested, this link discusses the fraud of the u201cBlack Book of Communismu201d and its bogus claim of u201c100 million deathu201d by communism.

,The Black Book of Communismu2013aka The Black Book of BullshitAlexander Finnegans answer to Why do people deny that communism killed millions of people in China and Russia?2.

76 million.

This list is here, with sources: death toll 2.

pdfThis is the death toll of the actions of the USSR.

,The Holomodor was not intentional and should not be counted.

Alexander Finneganu2019s answer to What is the history of famines and starvation in Russia 1850-present day?All the other numbers you are used to hearing have been shown to be inflated and exaggerated, many fabricated.

,This document is based on reliable research from respected authors and official figures.

,The Black Book of Communism has been shown to be a fraud.

Alexander Finneganu2019s answer to What is the most biased book youu2019ve ever read?This includes the Great Purges, the NKVD Polish repressions, the transfer of various populations that resulted in death, the gulags, etc.

Alexander Finneganu2019s answer to Why did Stalin kill the kulaks?Gulag numbers are here: number of gulag.

pdf 1,053,829 died in the gulag.

But it must also be remembered that this includes people who died from natural causes.

The death toll went up during WWII because everyone in the nation was on food rations so there was no starvation, but sick people and older people sometimes succumbed out of the stress.

There were also outbreaks of diseases that caused deaths.

Solzehnitsyn Lied pdf.

pdf,,The Great Purges included 777, 975.

But this includes a large number that were sentenced to execution but it was never carried out.

The Great Purges were not as top down as one might guess.

Alexander Finneganu2019s answer to Was Stalin central to the Great Purge of the 1930u2019s?The problem with capitalism is that the deaths are less u201cobviousu201d to the propagandized masses.

,Consider the following:,How researchers classify and quantify causes of death across a population has evolved in recent decades.

In addition to long-recognized physiological causes such as heart attack and cancer, the role of behavioral factorsu2014including smoking, dietary patterns and inactivityu2014began to be quantified in the 1990s.

,Dr.

Sandro Galea,More recent research has begun to look at the contribution of social factors to U.

S.

mortality.

In the first comprehensive analysis of such studies, researchers at Columbia Universityu2019s Mailman School of Public Health found that poverty, low levels of education, poor social support and other social factors contribute about as many deaths in the U.

S.

as such familiar causes as heart attacks, strokes and lung cancer.

,The full study findings are published online ahead of print in the American Journal of Public Health.

,The research team, led by Sandro Galea, MD, DrPH, chair of Epidemiology, estimated the number of U.

S.

deaths attributable to social factors using a systematic review of the available literature combined with vital statistics data.

They conducted a MEDLINE search for all English-language articles published between 1980 and 2007 with estimates of the relation between social factors and adult all-cause mortality.

Ultimately they considered 47 studies for meta-analysis.

,After calculating for the relative risks of mortality from social factors, researchers obtained prevalence estimates for each social factor using primarily Census Bureau data.

Individual social factors included education, poverty, health insurance status, employment status and job stress, social support, racism or discrimination, housing conditions and early childhood stressors.

Area-level social factors included area-level poverty, income inequality, deteriorating built environment, racial segregation, crime and violence, social capital and availability of open or green spaces.

,The investigators found that approximately 245,000 deaths in the United States in the year 2000 were attributable to low levels of education, 176,000 to racial segregation, 162,000 to low social support, 133,000 to individual-level poverty, 119,000 to income inequality, and 39,000 to area-level poverty.

u2028Overall, 4.

5% of U.

S.

deaths were found to be attributable to povertyu2014midway between previous estimates of 6% and 2.

3%.

However the risks associated with both poverty and low education were higher for individuals aged 25 to 64 than for those 65 or older.

,u201cSocial causes can be linked to death as readily as can pathophysiological and behavioral causes,u201d points out Dr.

Galea, who is also Gelman Professor of Epidemiology.

For example, the number of deaths the researchers calculated as attributable to low education (245,000) is comparable to the number caused by heart attacks (192,898), which was the leading cause of U.

S.

deaths in 2000.

The number of deaths attributable to racial segregation (176,000) is comparable to the number from cerebrovascular disease (167,661), the third leading cause of death in 2000, and the number attributable to low social support (162,000) compares to deaths from lung cancer (155,521).

,u201cThese findings argue for a broader public health conceptualization of the causes of mortality and an expansive policy approach that considers how social factors can be addressed to improve the health of populations,u201d observed Dr.

Galea.

,This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Capitalism leads to radical inequality and widespread poverty for a massive underclass.

The middle class in America has been receding thanks to neoliberal capitalism, which is capitalism without the government protections required to balance the savagery of the u201cinvisible handu201d of the markets.

,Brown Universityu2019s Costs of War Project this month released a new estimate of the total death toll from the U.

S.

wars in three countries: Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

The numbers, while conservatively estimated, are staggering.

Brownu2019s researchers estimate that at least 480,000 people have been directly killed by violence over the course of these conflicts, more than 244,000 of them civilians.

In addition to those killed by direct acts violence, the number of indirect deaths u2014 those resulting from disease, displacement, and the loss of critical infrastructure u2014 is believed to be several times higher, running into the millions.

Imperialism is an important part of capitalismu2014it provides access to cheap natural resources, labor markets, consumer markets, and other resources.

As time goes on the rate of profit in capitalist nations tends to fall.

Of course the public wonu2019t swallow the governmentu2019s claim that we are attacking Iraq to steal their oil.

Instead we have to be sold a bunch of bullshit about u201cprotecting our freedoms,u201d u201csupporting the troops,u201d and u201cfinding WMDu2019s.

u201d,Working class men and women sent off to foreign lands to protect the material interests of Wall Street, Exxon, and other corporations are slaughtered and return home in coffins.

u201cThank you for your service,u201d u201che was a war hero,u201d and u201che died fighting for our freedoms,u201d is supposed to make us feel better.

,When we send drone attacks to kill a terrorist we inadvertently hit a wedding party.

The survivors of the family remember.

And the boys dream of terrorism to avenge the senseless murders they faced from a nation halfway across the planet sending death from the sky.

,On 911 Americau2019s chickens came home to roost.

This is an ugly truth that Americans cannot accept.

Of course those who were killed by Al Quaeda that day didnu2019t deserve to die.

They were just as innocent as those whom we inadvertently killed.

But letu2019s not fool ourselves into believing they u201chate us for our freedoms.

u201d To say this is to mock the senseless murder of those who died on 911.

Letu2019s pay them the respect to find out the real reason Osama bin Ladin ordered the attacks that day instead of giving ourselves smug, self serving platitudes.

Communism vs socialism for dummies

By crafting a given ideology into an u201cItu2019s us, or themu2026 and itu2019s better if itu2019s them in the grave.

u201dItu2019s been done with:,Economics: Feudalism, vs.

Capitalism, vs.

Communism, vs.

Socialism, vs.

Criminalism.

,Government: Anarchy, vs.

Tribalism, vs.

Monarchy, vs.

Totalinarianism, vs.

Feudalism, vs.

Democracy, vs.

Imperialism.

,And even into other realms spiritual,familial, sexual, etc.

,As for a Step-by-step how-to guide, there are plenty of guides and reference materials out there.

,Mein Kampf,,The Communist Manifesto,,The Monroe Doctrine,,Cult-creation for Dummies,,etc.

Socialism vs communism vs capitalism

Democracy is pure political philosophy.

.

.

The others include some form of economics.

Communism, socialism etc does not preclude or exclude democracy nor did it exclude capitalism.

,In fact the Chinese never left capitalism they never achieved democracy.

Marxism vs communism

No, Marxism created in the 19c by Marx-Engels and others was a highest continuation of greatest cultural achievements since the Renaissance, Reformation, European Enlightenment and revolutions.

Because then just the Marxism had discovered a main scientific way for next progress in history as fighting for socialism-communism.

So, a misdirection of peoples conscience is a main purpose of the capitalist classu2019 propaganda.

And if under socialism can appear such unusual political phenomenon, like the Gorbachevu2019s perestroika in the second half of 1980s, that is a result of a typical personal ignorance inherited from capitalism, not Marxism-Leninism or knowledge.

Anyway, should enjoy a 21c greatest misdirection which is now moving the world backwards in history.

Socialism vs communism chart

Will you always have income inequality (rich vs poor) under any economic system like capitalism or communism?Yes, to some degree.

But some governments produce huge income gaps, by favoring the wealthy.

Other governments reduce the degree of inequality by policies that help the less well off.

Itu2019s not a measure of capitalism vs.

socialism vs.

communism.

It depends mostly on other things about the government.

For example, do the people running government actually care about the common people?,If you want to know and understand more, read this and examine the charts:

Socialist countries

Its an oversimplification to call Sweden socialist.

While its true that Sweden has been ruled by the Social Democratic Party (socialdemokraterna) for most of the 20th century, and without interruption from 1932 to 1976, there are several reasons which suggest Sweden is not socialist:n,Sweden has had a strong free trade-orientation since the 19th century.

The Swedish economy is small, specialized, open and dependent on exports, which has helped generated money for a generous welfare state.

,Connected to this: Sweden has become very business-friendly.

Entrepreneurship is openly encouraged in every possible way, which is why such a small country has spawned Skype, Spotify, Minecraft.

.

.

,Swedens defense relies on NATO.

Sweden isnt a member of NATO formally but that doesnt change the fact that Sweden depends upon the United States for its security.

In an EU context, Sweden is very vocal in its criticisms against human rights violations in states such as Russia and China, compared to countries such as Italy or eastern European states.

,In other respects, though, Sweden can be considered more socialist than other European countries.

For instance:n,Redistribution and focus on social issues has made the Swedish society one of the most equal in the world.

Gender equality, income equality, equality in the workplace.

.

.

you name it.

This is a point of pride for most Swedes.

,During the Cold War the Social Democratic Party developed the concept @Folkhemmet , a kind of utopian vision of a middle way between capitalism and socialism.

Through gradual reforms the aim was to eliminate income differences, encouraging collectivism and collaboration across social classes to advance the national interest.

As a result, Swedes have a very strong attachment to the State, and less so to the family or their local community.

,Other leftist ideas are important in Sweden, above all feminism and environmentalism.

This is true even for parties on the right side of the political spectrum in Sweden.

,At this point you might want to ask: this sounds fantastic - by combining capitalism and socialism, Sweden has created a rich and fair society.

Why arent everyone else doing it? To which I answer - there are a lot of problems and issues in Sweden which are not well known (often not even to Swedes themselves), but more importantly, these reforms could only have been possible and successful in a small, like-minded, uniform country in which almost everyone share the same beliefs and values.

Its easy to forget that there are more people in Moscow or New York than in Sweden.

But unique historic circumstances have allowed the creation of very peculiar and successful societies in Scandinavia, and I am happy that people are interested in knowing more about them.